You could say that Hiroshima contained enemy soldiers, and My Lai didn’t. What moral distinctions might you draw between the two?ġ. The Hiroshima bombing, in contrast, enjoys bipartisan admiration. The My Lai Massacre is now almost universally considered a heinous war crime. No one disputes that the Enola Gay’s crew was following orders. According to the best estimate I could find, about 12,000 of the dead were Japanese soldiers. In Hiroshima, the American crew of the Enola Gay killed 90,000 to 166,000 people in a mid-size Japanese city with an atomic bomb. But some platoon leaders testified (without plea bargains, as far as I can tell) that Medina had explicitly ordered them to kill every living thing in the village. After the massacre became public knowledge, Captain Ernest Medina denied giving orders to kill women and children. In the My Lai Massacre, a company of American ground troops killed between 347 and 504 unarmed Vietnamese civilians in a village suspected of harboring Communist guerrillas (the VC).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |